|
In Chapter Seven I chronicled
some of the outrageous activities of the national security agencies during
the 1950s. Perhaps the most famous single case of CIA mind control
experiments was that of Frank Olson, the scientist who has long been said
to have committed suicide by jumping out of a New York City hotel room
window after being given LSD without his knowledge. That, at least, is
the story that the public has come to know and that is recounted in this
book.
However, in the fall of 1999 the A&E cable television network aired
a program that reiterated previously broadcast doubts about the official
story and also offered the most comprehensive alternative theory yet presented.
The program noted that the New York City district attorney's office has
reopened the 1953 case as a homicide investigation. The D.A. was partly
influenced by the findings of a forensic pathologist from George Washington
University who examined Olson's remains and concluded that Olson suffered
a blow on the head with a blunt object prior to his fall. Just as importantly,
the pathologist did not find the facial lacerations that had been recorded
by the coroner in 1953 (though the skin was intact upon exhumation of
the remains), though cuts would have been expected from a violent thrust
through glass. Others interviewed on the program disputed the likelihood
of suicide from a closed window with the shade drawn, and in fact Olson
has spoken calmly to his wife on the telephone a few hours before. But
why would a quiet scientist like Frank Olson be murdered?
In the spring of 2000 Eric Olson, Frank Olsons son, called me in
my office at the University of Virginia. We talked about the standard
account of his father's death and he shared with me his theory, one that
will be tested by the New York district attorney. According to Eric Olson,
his father was eliminated because he posed a threat to the agency's top
secret drug experiments, including some that may have been conducted abroad.
Frank Olson, it seems, was not only an experimental subject but also engaged
as a researcher in the CIAs Special Operations Division. As a researcher
Olson himself used animals in experiments and perhaps witnessed the use
of humans as well. Whatever he saw, perhaps in U.S.-occupied West Germany,
seems to have greatly disturbed him. As it happens, Eric Olson told me,
the CIAs declassified assassination manual for 1953 specifies a
faked suicidal jump as a preferred means of elimination.
I asked Eric Olson for the image that came to his mind after nearly five
decades of life with one of the greatest burdens a person can have, the
unsolved mystery of his father's death. I have long thought that
accounts of my father's death are very like H.C. Andersens story
The Emperor's New Clothes, Olson said. After the perceptual
cloud is punctured and the emperor is seen to be stark naked one wonders
how the illusion of fine garb could have been sustained so long.
Olson continued:
Neither version of the story of my father's suicide
neither the one from 1953 in which he fell or jumped out a
hotel room window for no reason, nor the 1975 version in which he dives
through a closed window in a nine-day delayed LSD flashback while his
hapless CIA escort either looks on in dismay or is suddenly awakened by
the sound of crashing glass (both versions were peddled) made any
sense. On the other hand both versions deflected attention from the most
troubling issue inherent in the conduct of the kind of BW and mind-control
research in which my father and his colleagues were engaged.
The moral of my father's murder is that a post-Nuremberg world places
the experimenters as well as the research subjects (my father was both
simultaneously) at risk in a new way, particularly in countries that claim
the moral high ground. Maintenance of absolute secrecy in the new ethical
context implies that potential whistle blowers can neither be automatically
discredited nor brought to trial for treason. Nor can casualties arising
from experiments with unacknowledged weapons be publicly displayed. The
only remaining option is some form of disposal. This places
the architects of such experiments in a position more like that of Mafia
dons than traditional administrators of military research. The only organizational
exit is a horizontal one. In the face of this implication the CIA enforcers
of the early 1950's did not flinch, though historians along with the general
public have continued to see the state in all its finery.
My conversations with Eric Olson were one of two experiences that brought
his father's case home and the CIA's decades-old experiments home to me
after Undue Risk was first published. A history devoted specifically
to American biological weapons program, The Biology of Doom, also
appeared for the first time in 1999. Its author, Ed Regis, is like me
a former philosophy professor. Reading Regis book I learned that
Sidney Gottlieb, the CIA spymaster responsible for their chemical warfare
program, including the LSD experiments, died at the University of Virginia
Hospital. His death occurred while I was putting the finishing touches
on Undue Risk, and his deathbed was steps from my office in the
medical school.
Later a second irony occurred to me. Gottlieb's privacy was scrupulously
protected by my physician colleagues, his doctors, as it should have been.
They afforded him the moral consideration and human dignity that he seems
not to have granted those who were unfortunate enough to be unwitting
participants in his experiments. Yet I am more hopeful than ever that
efforts to quash the truth about some of the most closely held secrets
of cold war experiments, including the circumstances surrounding Frank
Olson's death, will ultimately fail. The only way to be sure is to demand
that federal officials open the files on biological and chemical experiments,
just as they did on radiation experiments. The New York district attorney's
handling of the Olson case can light the way for the rest of government,
but only if all of us refuse to forget the victims of undue risk.

Jonathan D. Moreno,
Ph.D.
Director, Center for Biomedical
Ethics
University of Virginia
Box 348 Health Sciences Center
Charlottesville, Va. 22908
|
Paperback
edition of Undue Risk, Routledge, November 2000.
Hardcover
edition, W.H. Freeman, 2000.
Video tapes of Jonathan
Morenos December 13, 2000 NIH lecture, The Historical and
Ethical Aspects of Informed Consent are avaiable from Satellite
Video.
Email: Satellite
Video or call: (800) 747-0856
|